Hollywood icons Jim Caviezel and Mel Gibson have made headlines after rejecting a $500 million deal from Netflix, citing their opposition to the platform’s woke agenda. The two actors, known for their outspoken views, have publicly criticized the growing influence of political and ideological narratives in the entertainment industry.

Reports suggest that Netflix had approached Caviezel and Gibson with an offer that included multiple projects, such as feature films and exclusive content

. However, both actors firmly turned it down, stating they would not compromise their beliefs for financial gain.

Caviezel, best known for his role in The Passion of the Christ, has consistently voiced his disapproval of Hollywood’s increasing focus on progressive ideologies over traditional storytelling. He expressed his frustration with the industry’s direction, emphasizing the need for authenticity and artistic integrity rather than conforming to corporate-driven agendas.

Gibson, a two-time Academy Award winner, has also faced his share of controversy in Hollywood but remains a respected filmmaker and actor. He has often spoken out against the pressure placed on creatives to align with prevailing cultural narratives. His refusal to accept the Netflix deal reflects his ongoing commitment to producing content that aligns with his personal and artistic principles.

In a joint statement, Caviezel and Gibson reportedly said, “We will not participate in that.” Their rejection of the deal has sparked intense discussion within the industry, with many debating whether their stance is a principled stand against corporate influence or a missed opportunity to engage with a broader audience.

Meanwhile, Netflix has yet to comment on the matter. The streaming giant, known for its diverse content and progressive messaging, continues to invest heavily in original programming that reflects contemporary social themes.

Fans and critics alike have taken to social media to express their opinions. While some applaud Caviezel and Gibson for standing by their values, others argue that turning down such a massive deal limits their ability to bring meaningful stories to a mainstream audience.

As Hollywood remains deeply divided on issues of free expression and ideological influence, this latest development further fuels the debate on the balance between artistic freedom and corporate agendas. Whether this decision will impact Caviezel and Gibson’s future projects remains to be seen, but their bold refusal of a half-billion-dollar offer sends a strong message about their commitment to their principles.