In an unexpected twist during the 2025 Formula 1 season, Christian Horner, the team principal of Red Bull Racing, made a striking statement that shook the paddock to its core. With just five words—“They didn’t adjust the front wing”—he suggested a potential advantage for McLaren’s MCL39, which he claimed was not compliant with the recent changes to the FIA regulations. This statement sparked a wave of speculation and discussion, especially since McLaren has proven to be a dominant force on the track this season. Horner’s words, uttered after the Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix, have not only drawn media attention but also prompted a response from the FIA itself.

The 2025 season has been a rollercoaster for Formula 1 fans, with McLaren showcasing unprecedented speed and consistency. The MCL39, driven by Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri, has dominated races, particularly in Miami, where Piastri secured an impressive 40-second lead over Max Verstappen. These performances have garnered admiration but also suspicion from rival teams, particularly Red Bull. Horner’s comments suggest that McLaren may have found a loophole, specifically regarding the MCL39’s front wing, which he claims does not comply with the new technical guidelines introduced by the FIA just before the Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix.

The FIA, led by President Mohammed Ben Sulayem, quickly responded to the allegations. In an official statement, the motorsport federation emphasized that all cars, including the MCL39, are thoroughly inspected for compliance with the regulations. Ben Sulayem pointed out that the recent changes to the technical guidelines, which include regulations on front wing flexibility and tire temperature management, were intended to ensure a level playing field. He denied that McLaren gained any advantage through non-compliant components. “Our inspections are rigorous and transparent. McLaren has met all requirements,” he stated, attempting to quell the speculation.
Nevertheless, Horner’s words have set the rumor mill in the paddock into motion. Red Bull, struggling to keep up with McLaren’s pace this season, appears determined to scrutinize their rivals’ performance. Earlier this year, Red Bull accused McLaren of using a trick with their wheel rims to manage tire temperatures, a claim the FIA investigated and dismissed due to lack of evidence. Horner’s recent remarks about the front wing seem to be a continuation of this strategy to pressure both McLaren and the FIA. His comments suggest that Red Bull believes McLaren’s speed is partly due to an interpretation of the rules that pushes the boundaries.
McLaren itself has responded calmly to the allegations. Team principal Zak Brown dismissed the accusations and challenged Red Bull to file an official complaint if they have concrete evidence of rule violations. “We operate fully within the rules and focus on building the best car,” Brown said in Miami. He emphasized that the MCL39’s speed is the result of hard work and innovation, not rule manipulation. This confident stance has paid off for McLaren, given their consistent performance across various circuits this season.
The discussion about the front wing raises a broader question about Formula 1: how far can teams go in interpreting the technical regulations? The sport has a long history of teams pushing the boundaries of the rules, often leading to innovations but also controversies. Horner himself has previously advocated for more freedom in interpreting the regulations, as he indicated in 2024 regarding the 2026 regulations. His current criticism of McLaren, however, appears to be a strategic move to draw attention to the competition’s performance while Red Bull struggles to regain their former dominance.
As the season progresses, the Monaco Grand Prix is likely to provide more clarity. If McLaren excels there again, speculation about their alleged regulatory advantages will only grow. For now, the Formula 1 paddock remains on edge, with Horner’s five words continuing to resonate: a subtle yet powerful attempt to influence the dynamics of the championship.